In brief: 7 out of 10
The episode starts of as a tribute to ‘Carry on don’t lose your head’. But once that’s over, and I breath a sigh of the relief, things really gets started (sorry, I can’t stand carry on films!).
I liked the episode, but I thought it might be a bit too dark and dramatic for the beginning of the series. There was plenty of story to get your teeth into and you felt you had to pay attention in case you missed some clue as to what would happen in future episodes.
Matt Smith was excellent. He seems to have settled into the role of the Doctor very well. Amy Pond and Rory portray a believable married couple I believe! There is one moment at the diner where Rory says a line and my immediate response was “yep! Married man!”
River Song, ahhh what to say about River Song. Slightly over hyped. However this does not deter from Alex Kingston’s portrayal which is very good. As a character however I think she is a little stereotyped; as in “sassy single female maverick”. Okay, there are not many of these characters around but I would like more individuality.
As for the episode itself, Moffat strikes the right balance between story and character development. The story itself was jammed packed with details that you felt you could not miss. There was more story and plot in this episode than actual action which may disappoint RTD fans. But I felt it was a return to quality rather than the “oooh shiny!” feel of past series.
Here be spoilers!
The monster’s in the episode are good, if somewhat predictable. Just as you have to keep looking at a weeping angel, you have to keep looking at these guys or you’ll forget they’re there. Even when you had a demonstration as to “oooh how bad” they are, so far they have come across as less scary than the Weeping Angels. As my husband pointed out having to keep looking at something and not blinking or it will kill you is more scary than “now, what did I come up here for?”. I suppose from the point of view of the audience such aliens are scary, as you see a favourite character blithely wonder into danger and unable to remember there are big bad aliens around. Still we’ll see how these develop. My husband is convinced that their overall plan for world domination revolves around stealing keys, pens and all those other things you swore you had a second ago.
Time lines play a big part in the episode and, if I can make a slight prediction, will probably continue to do so throughout the series. At the end of the last series we saw Moffat sending the Doctor back in time several times for comic effect. The opening of this episode shows the doctor about two hundred years older than when Amy and Rory last saw him. Later they reunite with the Doctor, who is just one year older. The Doctor is making his way through River’s life backwards; the effect being, as she says ‘each time I see him he knows me less’. With such a mess of time lines about something has to give eventually or you’ll end up with a granny knot!
Questions
Instead of making predictions for future episodes or what Steven Moffat is planning (I’ll badger my friends with those!) I have decided to pose questions the answers of which will probably be turn up towards the end of the series.
First of all there are at least two questions (that I can think of the top of my head) that need to be answered from the previous series:
Why did the TARDIS blow up?
Why doesn’t Amy remember the Daleks? (The Churchill episode, anyone? The Doctor said she should know and she doesn’t…)
Apparently the question the Amy was going to ask at the beginning of the Red Nose day short is also ‘going to be addressed’. Thanks to more observant fans for this one as I had to watch the episode again to find out what they were going on about!
More questions
At the beginning of the episode, what book was Amy reading? (My guess: A spotter’s guide to Timelords farting about in history)
Why had Amy and Rory left the Doctor before the start of this series but after the events in Space and Time (Red Nose Day episodes)?
How did the Doctor manage to appear in the Laurel and Hardy film? Giving that Rory has clearly watched it a few times and ‘explained the jokes’ to Amy? Probably not a vital question, but I’d still like to know.
Why does River Song bother with the ‘Stormcage’ prison? Given that she treats the place like a hotel!
Stetson versus Fez. Why did the Doctor change his mind and decide ‘Stetson’s are cool’? (I’m asking this one because of a rumour I’ve read, and I think this might be linked to it. However since it is just a rumour and I don’t know if it is true I’ll ask it as a question instead.)
When did the Doctor get a duplicate River Song diary? Up ’til now he’s relied on his memory to sync with River Song.
With all the events at the lakeside, a guy to answer some of the companions questions, a can of gasoline and a handy boat didn’t one of the companions think “Hang on, isn’t this a little too stage managed?”
According to River, the Doctor mustn’t know of the encounter with his past self. Has she never seen ‘The Five Doctor’s', ‘The Three Doctor’s', ‘The Two Doctor’s and so on?
River knows killing a timelord during their regeneration cycle kills them. How? (I believe I know the answer to this. Since we already know that River kills: a good man, the best she’s ever know, a hero to many etc. Which leads me to my next question, Why hasn’t the Doctor hasn’t put two and two together yet? However since he didn’t figure out what was in the Pandorica, (i.e. what was every evil alien scared of) and this was actually fairly obvious, I shouldn’t be surprised!
According to River – the companions do as they are told. Pardon? Since when?!
How does a child fit into and adult space suit? Stilts, or on a dwarf’s shoulders?
Do the silence go to the same tailor as the tenth Doctor?